State may be allowed to confiscate private property for non-public use
14:18 Thu 20 Mar 2008 - Anelia Zaharieva
Legal experts claim when the state seizes private property, only to sign it over to a private developer, it is acting as an intermediary in a deal involving two private parties where one of them is disadvantaged.
Legal experts claim when the state seizes private property, only to sign it over to a private developer, it is acting as an intermediary in a deal involving two private parties where one of them is disadvantaged.

Legislative changes, drafted by the Bulgarian government, may enable the state to apply summary procedures for seizing private properties if they impede private infrastructure ventures, as well as
public infrastructural projects, Dnevnik daily wrote.

Private power stations, water supply networks or waste sites will be categorised by the government as an infrastructure facility of national significance that may warrant the seizure of a particular private property and turning it over to a private developer.

Legal experts immediately described the proposal as controversial and unconstitutional.

The proposed amendments to the State Property Act have been posted on the government website and are being co-ordinated with relevant state departments. Currently, the state has the authority to expropriate private assets only if they are required for public use.

Explaining the proposed legislative changes, the government said they are needed because, regardless of the type of ownership, national infrastructure facilities are all equally important for the public - they are meant to address the needs of the entire society or particular society groups.

In this list the government includes facilities such as motorways, first grade and municipal roads, railway infrastructure, ports, airports, water, electric and gas grids, wastewater treatment and waste management facilities.

The Bulgarian Constitution forbids the confiscation of private property unless it is needed for state or municipal uses and only with just compensation.

Legal experts claim when the state seizes private property, only to sign it over to a private developer, it is acting as an intermediary in a deal involving two private parties where one of them is disadvantaged.

They also noted that proposed amendments fail to guarantee that the new owners of the infrastructure facility may not re-purpose at some point in the future. For example, they could decide to build a hotel on the site of a water treatment plant, Dnevnik daily noted.

 
 
Printer friendly version
 
 
 
 
more from Legal & regulatory
Current Issue as PDF
Download first page
 
BNB Fixing 28 Aug 2008
EUR1.478USD
EUR0.8042GBP
USD0.6766EUR
GBP1.2435EUR
EUR1.95583BGN
USD1.3241BGN
GBP2.43051BGN
 
Which Balkan country has the greatest investment potential?
Bulgaria
Romania
Greece
Turkey
Serbia
Montenegro
    Other Polls